Research
A continuously updated feed of research papers that pass our automated relevance screening for systematic trading — plus every paper we have published a review of, whatever it scored. Particular focus on alpha hypotheses that can be formalised and tested. The Radar also covers portfolio construction, market risk and execution where the research is directly relevant to systematic investment processes. Follow new entries by RSS.
15,697 papers screened · 250 on the radar · 69 shown
Frequent market instability and the lack of rigorously validated forecasting frameworks pose significant challenges for predicting market stress in the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE).
PAPER REPORTS · Random Forest crash-gated risk-off strategy, pooled equal-weighted, 2019-2022 test period: total return 67.26% (15.01%… · Annualized volatility 16.39% (strategy) vs. 18.11% (buy-and-hold); maximum drawdown -32.21% vs.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.47 · Return +25.2% · Max DD -21.6%
Clean energy equities play a pivotal role in sustainable finance and the global energy transition, yet their performance remains highly sensitive to global fossil energy price fluctuations and climate policy uncertainty.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.07 · Return +5.2% · Max DD -40.7%
This paper examines whether the risk-adjusted performance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)-focused Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) reflects distinct investment behavior or is primarily influenced by benchmark exposure, geography, and sector…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.56 · Return +53.4% · Max DD -37.6%
Modern portfolio theory identifies diversification as the primary tool for risk reduction. However, under model uncertainty, this cornerstone may no longer remain optimal.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.52 · Return -29.5% · Max DD -24.9%
Abstract This study develops a robust framework for modeling dynamic volatility, asymmetry, and tail dependence in financial returns, focusing on the daily returns of Natural Resource Index () and the Oil and Gas Index ().
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.47 · Return +42.5% · Max DD -27.9%
We investigate arbitrage in a discrete-time financial market model where, in addition to finitely many dynamically traded assets, there are also static options to choose from.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.35 · Return +21.4% · Max DD -34.1%
Portfolio risk assessment ordinarily relies on reliable estimates of cross-asset return covariances, which are difficult to obtain in short, high-dimensional panels.
PAPER REPORTS · In-sample standardized variance percentile of the news-only allocation: 0.69%-1.33% across four prespecified capped… · Standardized in-sample variance 0.357, 8.3% below the equal-risk (inverse-volatility) benchmark and 35.6% above the…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.47 · Return +44.2% · Max DD -29.9%
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to discover trading strategies, and much of the resulting literature shares a methodological weakness: many candidate strategies are generated, the best is reported, and neither look-ahead bias nor the…
PAPER REPORTS · Best gpt-4.1 discovery (E3, RSI x volume, 453-stock universe): design Sharpe 1.69 (2017-2021), evaluation Sharpe 0.18… · Best claude-sonnet-5 discovery: design Sharpe 0.44 (2017-2021), evaluation Sharpe -0.33 / -29% (2022-2025), DSR 0.18,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.10 · Return -10.8% · Max DD -47.8%
Algorithmic trading now represents a market exceeding $20 billion, where even marginal gains in signal robustness can translate into economically significant returns.
PAPER REPORTS · Hybrid ensemble, OOS 2025 (252 trading days), 2.2bp per trade per leg: total return 51.26%, Sharpe 2.44, Sortino 5.35,… · Hybrid ensemble, OOS 2025: annualised CAPM alpha 0.423 (p = 0.011), beta 0.048, Probabilistic Sharpe Ratio 0.960
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +696.5% · Max DD -365.1%
We model equity markets using geometric Brownian particles entering and exiting at rank-dependent intensities.
PAPER REPORTS · p=0 (equally weighted) diversity-weighted portfolio capitalization growth: +3.4% per year above the front speed,… · p=1 (market) portfolio: -0.5% per year relative to the front, 1975-2024, frictionless
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.63 · Return +66.6% · Max DD -37.1%
PAPER REPORTS · Minimum Variance Portfolio (MVP), 2019-2025 daily, no transaction costs stated: mean daily return 0.0005519, daily… · Minimum Correlation Portfolio (MCP): mean daily return 0.0007516, std dev 0.0014739, Sharpe (std dev) 0.5099, Sharpe…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.21 · Return +11.2% · Max DD -24.8%
We show that the key optimization results of the classical Markowitz portfolio selection theory, originally formulated for variance as the risk measure, remain available in explicit closed form under a broader class of strictly convex quadratic risk measures.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.50 · Return +143.8% · Max DD -75.0%
Lead-lag relationships are widely used in financial time series, and many clustering algorithms based on them have been developed. The traditional DTW-KMedoids algorithm performs well both on the synthetic dataset and the real financial dataset.
PAPER REPORTS · Sharpe 0.866, annual return 6.21%, annual volatility 7.17%, max drawdown -63.908, hit rate 0.520, profit-loss ratio… · Sharpe 0.808 / 0.790 (KShape mod / med), lead strategy, 679 assets, same period; drawdowns -67.604 / -69.418
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.39 · Return +27.5% · Max DD -39.3%
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in investment decision-making, yet prior work shows that they exhibit systematic, model-specific investment preferences.
PAPER REPORTS · Weekly rebalanced equal-weight long-only top-100 portfolio from Qwen3-8B scores, 427 S&P 500 stocks, 29 signal weeks /… · Realized Sharpe of the top-100 portfolios is shown only graphically (Figure 5c, axis range roughly 2–4); no point…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.52 · Return +57.3% · Max DD -40.6%
In this paper we propose a new formulation of the Bayesian Filter as used in the discrete-time Markov-Switching-Multifractal (MSM) model of volatility based on existing permutation symmetry within the likelihood structure.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.90 · Return +54.5% · Max DD -20.2%
Implied volatility surfaces summarise the option market and are central to many financial applications.
PAPER REPORTS · Surface point-forecast RMSE aggregated over 30 horizons: 0.01262 vs persistence 0.01343, +6.09% gain; MAE gain +3.45%;… · h=1: RMSE 0.00619 vs persistence 0.00535 (-15.72%); MAE -34.49%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.00 · Return -1.0% · Max DD -329.1%
Abstract A key puzzle in finance is why algorithmic traders with advanced neural models sometimes fail to beat simple traditional strategies, while in other cases they clearly outperform them.
PAPER REPORTS · Cluster 0 (most efficient), test 2025-2026, net of 0.1% one-way costs: DDPG annualised return 34.72%, cumulative… · Cluster 0 best classical: HRP Sharpe 1.591, Calmar 2.3562, max drawdown -13.07%, annualised return 30.80%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.78 · Return +25.3% · Max DD -11.7%
Deep hedging is a data-driven approach to learn hedging strategies. It relies on synthetic price paths generator, as real market data is often limited for training.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 1.78 · Return +5.9% · Max DD -0.6%
Hedge ratios, factor models and diversified portfolios all rest on an estimate of which firms move together.
PAPER REPORTS · Variance-harvest attribution (selling variance at VIX-squared against the paper's 12m equal-weighted realized leg, July… · Risk by REC quartile over the same 329 months: probability of loss 0.29, 0.21, 0.26, 0.15; mean loss given loss…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.73 · Return +68.2% · Max DD -36.5%
We study continuous-time dynamic portfolio optimization under a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint on the investor's terminal loss.
PAPER REPORTS · Complete market, binding c = -0.94, T = 1 simulated: E[W_T] = 1.0242, CVaR_0.95(-W_T) = -0.9406, average exposure… · Complete market, nonbinding c = -0.86, T = 1 simulated: E[W_T] = 1.0322, CVaR_0.95(-W_T) = -0.8671, average exposure…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +55.2% · Max DD -26.8%
Abstract Market timing models aim to anticipate short-term market movements according to a given source of information. Such information could be extracted from an analysis of history or a forecast of the future.
PAPER REPORTS · S&P500 timing, 2018: index -6.7% annualized; Strat1-L 3.8%, Strat1-LS 14.3%, Strat2-L 0.8%, Strat2-LS 8.2% (no… · S&P500 timing, 2023: index 21.6%; Strat1-L 21.9%, Strat1-LS 22.1%, Strat2-L 25.5%, Strat2-LS 29.4% (no transaction…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.61 · Return +49.0% · Max DD -31.2%
We consider the question of the optimal timing of the sale of an asset with stochastic dynamics. Our analysis is based on the method of the distribution builder introduced by Sharpe, Goldstein and Blythe [SGB00] for the purpose of optimal portfolio selection.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.59 · Return +60.8% · Max DD -39.2%
We present in this article a non-parametric value-at-risk (VaR+CVaR) algorithm that remains accurate for an arbitrarily large number of underlying positions. The algorithm solves the two inherent problems of VaR estimation.
PAPER REPORTS · Median 99% daily VaR breach rate 1.0 +/- 0.1% across 9 parameter settings, 500 random portfolios, no transaction costs… · Per-configuration medians (no added delay): 0.97%, 1.06%, 1.09% (1260-day window, 14/30/45-day vol); 0.90%, 0.99%,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 1.58 · Return +17.6% · Max DD -3.4%
We develop parametric Entropic Value-at-Risk (EVaR) portfolio optimization for tempered stable Lévy returns.
PAPER REPORTS · ICA+NTS minimum-EVaR (EVaR_95): gross annualized Sharpe 0.616, CAGR 8.60%, annualized vol 15.28%, cumulative return… · ICA+NTS minimum-EVaR net Sharpe: 0.608 at 5bp, 0.599 at 10bp, 0.573 at 25bp; net cumulative return 630.95% at 25bp
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.24 · Return +20.5% · Max DD -37.6%
We develop a scalable adjoint-to-control framework for continuous-time portfolio choice under smooth pointwise constraints.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.19 · Return +24.7% · Max DD -66.8%
Human capital is a central organizational input, but standard financial data reveal little about firm-specific disruptions to workforce availability, cost, skills, and continuity.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.56 · Return +50.1% · Max DD -40.8%
Two old market sayings hold that news is already priced in by the time it is published, and that the rumor is bought while the news is sold. Both place the price move associated with a piece of news before and at publication rather than after it.
PAPER REPORTS · Fade small-cap launch/partnership news (short after positive, buy after negative; enter close of day +5, exit close of… · Short any covered small cap (sentiment-ignoring benchmark, 260,472 events, same windows, 2023-2026): 15.9% annualized,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.23 · Return -18.9% · Max DD -51.9%
The authors present a rigorous empirical evaluation of three distinct optimization paradigms for institutional factor portfolio construction: an entropy-based photonic quantum annealer (Dirac-3, Quantum Computing Inc.), a commercial mixed-integer programming…
PAPER REPORTS · Dirac-3, best overall configuration (beta1=0, beta2=1): Sharpe 0.760, Sortino 0.841, Calmar 0.567, MDD -3.47%, CVaR5%… · Dirac-3 (beta1=0, beta2=0.5): Sharpe 0.721, Calmar 0.538, MDD -2.63% (lowest in both sweeps), CVaR5% -1.107%, annual…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.25 · Return +11.4% · Max DD -18.7%
Against the background of increasing volatility and complex risk factors in global markets, options and futures have become important instruments for risk hedging and uncertainty management.
PAPER REPORTS · Futures hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 7.95%, annualized volatility 10.28%, hedging efficiency 46.87%,… · Option hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 8.31%, annualized volatility 8.76%, hedging efficiency 54.73%,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.74 · Return +83.0% · Max DD -47.8%
Using the local time-space calculus of Peskir (2005) and the method developed in Mijatovic (2010), we derive a new integral representation for the distribution of the first-passage time (FPT) of a diffusion process through a time-dependent barrier.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.66 · Return +35.3% · Max DD -18.7%
We develop a geometric theory of arbitrage-free implied variance surface dynamics.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample RMSE(delta a2) improvement of full (beta,eta,psi) model over SSR-only: 17-21% at 3M-6M (215.7 vs 272.8 at… · Out-of-sample RMSE(delta a1) improvement of adding eta: 1-4% versus SSR-only at 1M-6M, essentially flat at 12M
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.84 · Return -0.1% · Max DD -0.1%
Diffusion generative models have rapidly emerged as powerful tools for modeling complex financial data.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.53 · Return +79.3% · Max DD -50.5%
This article presents with DYSANOS the first generative market model for smooth SANOS option surfaces for all strikes and expiries which are free of static arbitrage.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.19 · Return -0.0% · Max DD -0.1%
Financial forecasting models are typically developed in full precision, yet production deployment often requires low-precision inference to reduce memory and computational cost. Post-training quantization (PTQ) enables such deployment without retraining.
PAPER REPORTS · FP32 mean daily IC (cross-sectional Spearman, averaged over test dates, 2018-2025 walk-forward): TSMixer 0.490±0.043,… · Baseline mean daily IC over the same folds: pooled HAR 0.408, persistence (trailing 5-day realized vol) 0.315
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.41 · Return +41.7% · Max DD -37.2%
Volatility is a fundamental characteristic of financial markets and plays a crucial role in investment decision-making, portfolio management, and financial risk assessment.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample RMSE 0.009552 (GARCH(1,1)) vs 0.009670 (EGARCH(1,1)), 230 one-step-ahead rolling forecasts, 30 May… · Out-of-sample MAE 0.007521 (GARCH) vs 0.007406 (EGARCH)
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.83 · Return +37.3% · Max DD -11.4%
Specialist training beats generalist scale when forecasting financial statements. To our knowledge, no prior work jointly forecasts complete financial statements beyond one year, yet in a discounted-cash-flow valuation most firm value sits past that window.
PAPER REPORTS · Forma change-space R^2 0.289 on full test sample, test period 2010-2024, no transaction costs applicable (forecasting… · Forma per-horizon R^2: 39.0% at h=1 falling to 22.5% at h=20 (full sample); 38.0% at h=1 to 23.7% at h=20 (LLM sample)
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.57 · Return +17.5% · Max DD -10.5%
The Triadic Stress Index (TSI) takes a network index whose four factors were first observed in soil microbiome co-occurrence networks and applies it, without alteration, to the correlation network of financial assets.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample F1@p90 = 0.447 (TSI with memory, 2016-2026, 897 windows, OFR 23-window crisis list; no transaction costs… · F1 gap vs Absorption Ratio = 0.273 (0.447 vs 0.174) out of sample 2016-2026, block-bootstrap 95% CI [0.095, 0.392],…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.87 · Return +229.7% · Max DD -46.7%
In this paper we investigate the information content of the lower part of the spectrum of financial correlation matrices, as a source of information on market synchronization.
OUR BACKTEST · CAPITAL EXHAUSTED · FAILED SANITY CHECK
Foundation models for time series forecasting demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but often underperform on specialized domains such as high-frequency finance.
PAPER REPORTS · Mean per-day correlation 0.3730 (GatedLinear+RF, 40 test days per stock, Dec 2024-Jan 2026 sample, transaction costs… · Pooled correlation 0.5972 and cross-day correlation 0.5631 (GatedLinear+RF, same 40-day test window)
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.42 · Return -0.6% · Max DD -0.8%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.48 · Return +15.8% · Max DD -20.6%
We develop a certified, scalable approximation for high-dimensional Wasserstein distributionally robust portfolio optimization. For expected-utility maximization under order-one Wasserstein ambiguity, standard duality yields a semi-infinite convex program.
PAPER REPORTS · ε=10^-2 (best DRO policy), 476-asset monthly rebalanced, 2021-2025, no transaction costs: cumulative return 3.64,… · ε=10^-4, 2021-2025, no costs: CR 4.77, σ 0.45, SR 0.93, MDD 0.38, Calmar 1.12
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.63 · Return +106.7% · Max DD -45.0%
We study Lambda-quantiles, a generalisation of classical quantiles in which the constant probability level $λ\in [0,1]$ is replaced by a functional parameter $Λ\colon \mathbb{R} \to [0,1]$.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.68 · Return +249.4% · Max DD -84.8%
Current portfolio construction methods are either agnostic to the effects of idiosyncratic shocks (standard factor models) or to the latent data structure driving systematic returns (recent graph-based approaches).
PAPER REPORTS · Contagion Cut (proposed): CAGR 21.0%, Sharpe 1.07, Calmar 0.611, Jan 2019-Mar 2026, 0 bps transaction costs · Contagion Cut: Sharpe 1.04 at 10 bps, 1.01 at 20 bps, 0.929 at 50 bps (CAGR 20.5%, 19.9%, 18.3%), Jan 2019-Mar 2026
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +143.1% · Max DD -40.3%
Predicting financial asset returns remains one of the most difficult challenges in empirical finance, driven by the low signal-to-noise ratio and the semi-strong form of market efficiency.
PAPER REPORTS · Sector LSTM (main 3-layer, k=10, 1995-2024): mean daily long-short return 0.100% before costs, Newey-West t = 7.81,… · Sector LSTM appendix figures (after 2bp per half turn): mean daily return 0.053%, t-statistic 4.106, annualized return…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.03 · Return -9.6% · Max DD -140.3%
The enormous growth in datasets, both in number and size, has prompted investors to adapt to new ways for assimilating information.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.11 · Return +31.6% · Max DD -96.3%
Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives, but its finite-budget behavior remains fragile: fixed inner-loop hyperparameters can produce unstable value estimates, persistent Bellman residuals, and…
PAPER REPORTS · Scheme 6 out-of-sample (918 daily obs, chronological test set, after 5bp turnover costs, mean over 20 seeds): Sharpe… · Scheme 0 fixed-parameter baseline out-of-sample (same test set, after 5bp costs, 20 seeds): Sharpe 0.5628 (sd 0.2281),…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.34 · Return +16.6% · Max DD -10.4%
Control policies optimized in simulation can perform poorly in the real system when the parameters $x$ of the simulator are estimated from limited data but the resulting parameter uncertainty is not represented inside the simulation.
PAPER REPORTS · In-simulator spectral risk (x100, warm-up H=T), BS-VOL: RLM-trained policy 10.15 on RLM paths and 10.33 on SLM paths;… · In-simulator spectral risk (x100, warm-up H=T), HESTON-CORR: RLM policy 19.87 (SLM paths) / 19.93 (RLM paths) vs SLM…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.18 · Return -66.9% · Max DD -81.1%
Financial sentiment classifiers are commonly evaluated against human labels, but strong linguistic performance does not necessarily imply economically useful return predictability. This study separates these questions through two experiments.
PAPER REPORTS · One-day mean rank IC, 2019 Benzinga S&P 100 sample: FinBERT 0.0143 (largest), Financial-RoBERTa 0.0141, Naive Bayes… · FinBERT one-day long–short: gross total return 12.96%, annualized Sharpe 1.11, max drawdown -6.37% (2019, gross — no…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -1.16 · Return -61.4% · Max DD -64.2%
Fractional Brownian motion (fBm) exhibits attractive features for financial modeling, including long-range dependence, path roughness, and anomalous diffusion.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.23 · Return +8.6% · Max DD -6.9%
We introduce a framework for preference-robust decision making when preferences over risk are modelled through generalised distortion risk measures. Unlike distributional robustness, our approach addresses ambiguity in the risk functional itself.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.27 · Return +30.1% · Max DD -23.4%