Research
A continuously updated feed of research papers that pass our automated relevance screening for systematic trading — plus every paper we have published a review of, whatever it scored. Particular focus on alpha hypotheses that can be formalised and tested. The Radar also covers portfolio construction, market risk and execution where the research is directly relevant to systematic investment processes. Follow new entries by RSS.
15,697 papers screened · 250 on the radar · 9 shown
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to discover trading strategies, and much of the resulting literature shares a methodological weakness: many candidate strategies are generated, the best is reported, and neither look-ahead bias nor the…
PAPER REPORTS · Best gpt-4.1 discovery (E3, RSI x volume, 453-stock universe): design Sharpe 1.69 (2017-2021), evaluation Sharpe 0.18… · Best claude-sonnet-5 discovery: design Sharpe 0.44 (2017-2021), evaluation Sharpe -0.33 / -29% (2022-2025), DSR 0.18,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.10 · Return -10.8% · Max DD -47.8%
Deep hedging is a data-driven approach to learn hedging strategies. It relies on synthetic price paths generator, as real market data is often limited for training.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 1.78 · Return +5.9% · Max DD -0.6%
Abstract Market timing models aim to anticipate short-term market movements according to a given source of information. Such information could be extracted from an analysis of history or a forecast of the future.
PAPER REPORTS · S&P500 timing, 2018: index -6.7% annualized; Strat1-L 3.8%, Strat1-LS 14.3%, Strat2-L 0.8%, Strat2-LS 8.2% (no… · S&P500 timing, 2023: index 21.6%; Strat1-L 21.9%, Strat1-LS 22.1%, Strat2-L 25.5%, Strat2-LS 29.4% (no transaction…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.61 · Return +49.0% · Max DD -31.2%
Current portfolio construction methods are either agnostic to the effects of idiosyncratic shocks (standard factor models) or to the latent data structure driving systematic returns (recent graph-based approaches).
PAPER REPORTS · Contagion Cut (proposed): CAGR 21.0%, Sharpe 1.07, Calmar 0.611, Jan 2019-Mar 2026, 0 bps transaction costs · Contagion Cut: Sharpe 1.04 at 10 bps, 1.01 at 20 bps, 0.929 at 50 bps (CAGR 20.5%, 19.9%, 18.3%), Jan 2019-Mar 2026
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +143.1% · Max DD -40.3%
Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives, but its finite-budget behavior remains fragile: fixed inner-loop hyperparameters can produce unstable value estimates, persistent Bellman residuals, and…
PAPER REPORTS · Scheme 6 out-of-sample (918 daily obs, chronological test set, after 5bp turnover costs, mean over 20 seeds): Sharpe… · Scheme 0 fixed-parameter baseline out-of-sample (same test set, after 5bp costs, 20 seeds): Sharpe 0.5628 (sd 0.2281),…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.34 · Return +16.6% · Max DD -10.4%
We audit whether candle-based machine-learning models can turn predictions of cryptocurrency extrema or short-horizon outcomes into positive Binance Spot paper policies after assumed costs.
PAPER REPORTS · Frozen mandatory-daily selector: -6.72% compounded, 2026-07-01 to 07-19, 19 cycles, 3 wins/16 losses, 31 bps… · Frozen mandatory-daily selector cost stress, same period: -4.74% at 20 bps, -6.72% at 31 bps, -10.21% at 51 bps…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.00 · Return +0.0% · Max DD 0.0%
We present a unified approach to designing trend-following (TF) systems and classify them into European, American, and Time Series Momentum categories.
PAPER REPORTS · European TF system: annualized Sharpe 0.47, monthly returns net of transaction costs and net of 2%/20%… · American TF system: annualized Sharpe 0.50, net of transaction costs and 2%/20% fees, 31 December 1999 to 30 June 2026…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.10 · Return +8.4% · Max DD -30.4%
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) provides a native photonic quantum heuristic for sampling dense subgraphs from adjacency matrices, offering a scalable physical approach to combinatorial graph search problems.
PAPER REPORTS · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020 (trading effectively April 2020… · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020", "sharpe": "2.050 ± 0.190",…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -1.00 · Return -5.8% · Max DD -6.2%
This paper studies conditional allocation between a growth/technology ETF basket, denoted by $G$, and a defensive income/value-oriented ETF basket, denoted by $D$.
PAPER REPORTS · Selected smooth-score policy, 2017-06-28 to 2026-05-15, 10bp cost: 19.24% CAGR, 19.29% vol, Sharpe 1.01, Sortino 1.22,… · Selected policy vs 50/50 G/D: annual excess 1.78%, tracking error 3.74%, info ratio 0.48, max DD improvement 1.95%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.92 · Return +111.2% · Max DD -31.6%