Research
A continuously updated feed of research papers that pass our automated relevance screening for systematic trading — plus every paper we have published a review of, whatever it scored. Particular focus on alpha hypotheses that can be formalised and tested. The Radar also covers portfolio construction, market risk and execution where the research is directly relevant to systematic investment processes. Follow new entries by RSS.
15,697 papers screened · 250 on the radar · 25 shown
Modern portfolio theory identifies diversification as the primary tool for risk reduction. However, under model uncertainty, this cornerstone may no longer remain optimal.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.52 · Return -29.5% · Max DD -24.9%
Portfolio risk assessment ordinarily relies on reliable estimates of cross-asset return covariances, which are difficult to obtain in short, high-dimensional panels.
PAPER REPORTS · In-sample standardized variance percentile of the news-only allocation: 0.69%-1.33% across four prespecified capped… · Standardized in-sample variance 0.357, 8.3% below the equal-risk (inverse-volatility) benchmark and 35.6% above the…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.47 · Return +44.2% · Max DD -29.9%
Algorithmic trading now represents a market exceeding $20 billion, where even marginal gains in signal robustness can translate into economically significant returns.
PAPER REPORTS · Hybrid ensemble, OOS 2025 (252 trading days), 2.2bp per trade per leg: total return 51.26%, Sharpe 2.44, Sortino 5.35,… · Hybrid ensemble, OOS 2025: annualised CAPM alpha 0.423 (p = 0.011), beta 0.048, Probabilistic Sharpe Ratio 0.960
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +696.5% · Max DD -365.1%
We model equity markets using geometric Brownian particles entering and exiting at rank-dependent intensities.
PAPER REPORTS · p=0 (equally weighted) diversity-weighted portfolio capitalization growth: +3.4% per year above the front speed,… · p=1 (market) portfolio: -0.5% per year relative to the front, 1975-2024, frictionless
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.63 · Return +66.6% · Max DD -37.1%
PAPER REPORTS · Minimum Variance Portfolio (MVP), 2019-2025 daily, no transaction costs stated: mean daily return 0.0005519, daily… · Minimum Correlation Portfolio (MCP): mean daily return 0.0007516, std dev 0.0014739, Sharpe (std dev) 0.5099, Sharpe…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.21 · Return +11.2% · Max DD -24.8%
We show that the key optimization results of the classical Markowitz portfolio selection theory, originally formulated for variance as the risk measure, remain available in explicit closed form under a broader class of strictly convex quadratic risk measures.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.50 · Return +143.8% · Max DD -75.0%
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in investment decision-making, yet prior work shows that they exhibit systematic, model-specific investment preferences.
PAPER REPORTS · Weekly rebalanced equal-weight long-only top-100 portfolio from Qwen3-8B scores, 427 S&P 500 stocks, 29 signal weeks /… · Realized Sharpe of the top-100 portfolios is shown only graphically (Figure 5c, axis range roughly 2–4); no point…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.52 · Return +57.3% · Max DD -40.6%
Abstract A key puzzle in finance is why algorithmic traders with advanced neural models sometimes fail to beat simple traditional strategies, while in other cases they clearly outperform them.
PAPER REPORTS · Cluster 0 (most efficient), test 2025-2026, net of 0.1% one-way costs: DDPG annualised return 34.72%, cumulative… · Cluster 0 best classical: HRP Sharpe 1.591, Calmar 2.3562, max drawdown -13.07%, annualised return 30.80%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.78 · Return +25.3% · Max DD -11.7%
We study continuous-time dynamic portfolio optimization under a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constraint on the investor's terminal loss.
PAPER REPORTS · Complete market, binding c = -0.94, T = 1 simulated: E[W_T] = 1.0242, CVaR_0.95(-W_T) = -0.9406, average exposure… · Complete market, nonbinding c = -0.86, T = 1 simulated: E[W_T] = 1.0322, CVaR_0.95(-W_T) = -0.8671, average exposure…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +55.2% · Max DD -26.8%
Abstract Market timing models aim to anticipate short-term market movements according to a given source of information. Such information could be extracted from an analysis of history or a forecast of the future.
PAPER REPORTS · S&P500 timing, 2018: index -6.7% annualized; Strat1-L 3.8%, Strat1-LS 14.3%, Strat2-L 0.8%, Strat2-LS 8.2% (no… · S&P500 timing, 2023: index 21.6%; Strat1-L 21.9%, Strat1-LS 22.1%, Strat2-L 25.5%, Strat2-LS 29.4% (no transaction…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.61 · Return +49.0% · Max DD -31.2%
We develop a scalable adjoint-to-control framework for continuous-time portfolio choice under smooth pointwise constraints.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.19 · Return +24.7% · Max DD -66.8%
The authors present a rigorous empirical evaluation of three distinct optimization paradigms for institutional factor portfolio construction: an entropy-based photonic quantum annealer (Dirac-3, Quantum Computing Inc.), a commercial mixed-integer programming…
PAPER REPORTS · Dirac-3, best overall configuration (beta1=0, beta2=1): Sharpe 0.760, Sortino 0.841, Calmar 0.567, MDD -3.47%, CVaR5%… · Dirac-3 (beta1=0, beta2=0.5): Sharpe 0.721, Calmar 0.538, MDD -2.63% (lowest in both sweeps), CVaR5% -1.107%, annual…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.25 · Return +11.4% · Max DD -18.7%
Against the background of increasing volatility and complex risk factors in global markets, options and futures have become important instruments for risk hedging and uncertainty management.
PAPER REPORTS · Futures hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 7.95%, annualized volatility 10.28%, hedging efficiency 46.87%,… · Option hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 8.31%, annualized volatility 8.76%, hedging efficiency 54.73%,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.74 · Return +83.0% · Max DD -47.8%
We develop a certified, scalable approximation for high-dimensional Wasserstein distributionally robust portfolio optimization. For expected-utility maximization under order-one Wasserstein ambiguity, standard duality yields a semi-infinite convex program.
PAPER REPORTS · ε=10^-2 (best DRO policy), 476-asset monthly rebalanced, 2021-2025, no transaction costs: cumulative return 3.64,… · ε=10^-4, 2021-2025, no costs: CR 4.77, σ 0.45, SR 0.93, MDD 0.38, Calmar 1.12
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.63 · Return +106.7% · Max DD -45.0%
Current portfolio construction methods are either agnostic to the effects of idiosyncratic shocks (standard factor models) or to the latent data structure driving systematic returns (recent graph-based approaches).
PAPER REPORTS · Contagion Cut (proposed): CAGR 21.0%, Sharpe 1.07, Calmar 0.611, Jan 2019-Mar 2026, 0 bps transaction costs · Contagion Cut: Sharpe 1.04 at 10 bps, 1.01 at 20 bps, 0.929 at 50 bps (CAGR 20.5%, 19.9%, 18.3%), Jan 2019-Mar 2026
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +143.1% · Max DD -40.3%
Predicting financial asset returns remains one of the most difficult challenges in empirical finance, driven by the low signal-to-noise ratio and the semi-strong form of market efficiency.
PAPER REPORTS · Sector LSTM (main 3-layer, k=10, 1995-2024): mean daily long-short return 0.100% before costs, Newey-West t = 7.81,… · Sector LSTM appendix figures (after 2bp per half turn): mean daily return 0.053%, t-statistic 4.106, annualized return…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.03 · Return -9.6% · Max DD -140.3%
The enormous growth in datasets, both in number and size, has prompted investors to adapt to new ways for assimilating information.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.11 · Return +31.6% · Max DD -96.3%
Automated market makers (AMMs) are typically interpreted and evaluated as decentralized exchanges.
PAPER REPORTS · VBIAX, monthly TE, Jan 2, 2014 – Jun 30, 2026: G3M Pareto-dominates (higher CAGR and lower TE) for gamma in [2.73%,… · EQL NAV, economic mandate, Jun 19, 2018 – May 29, 2026: G3M dominates for gamma in [3.22%, 7.09%]
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.71 · Return +133.0% · Max DD -42.0%
This paper builds Path Portfolio Optimization: portfolio theory on a path-first framework in which the signature is the universal coordinate of the price path, and asks whether it survives estimation.
PAPER REPORTS · Cross-area lead-lag portfolio, sign-carrying excitation 1→2 with q=0.85: mean P&L +0.000189, s.e. · Cross-area, sign-carrying excitation 2→1 with q=0.85: mean P&L −0.000227, s.e. 0.000012, t=−18.92, annualized Sharpe…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.45 · Return +21.4% · Max DD -19.5%
Recent advances in Generative AI have substantially improved financial sentiment analysis through post-trained financial large language models (LLMs).
PAPER REPORTS · FinSMART (static): cumulative return 264.9%, annualized return 91.5%, Sharpe 1.97, Sortino 2.40, Calmar 4.23, RankIC… · FinSMART (periodically retrained every 6 months): cumulative return 406.2%, annualized return 125.7%, Sharpe 2.41,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.46 · Return -48.2% · Max DD -75.2%
The theory of portfolios, and its allied notions and fundamental results concerning growth optimality, the numéraire property, and ``market viability'' -- which rules out the possibility of financing nontrivial future liability streams starting with…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.51 · Return +48.5% · Max DD -23.8%
The distribution of a normal mean-variance mixture depends on the law of its positive mixing variable. We compare six parametric mixing laws with a grid nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator under the same determinant identification constraint.
PAPER REPORTS · Model-based lower-envelope CPT value at the robust optimum: -0.04478 at 5% annual reference return; -0.09245 at 10%… · Empirical holdout CPT value at the robust weights: -0.04867 at 5% reference; -0.10049 at 10% reference (holdout 483…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.13 · Return +0.1% · Max DD -0.2%
Building on the identity that expected regret equals the covariance between costs and decisions, this paper develops the complete derivative theory of the covariance regret functional.
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.57 · Return +131.1% · Max DD -35.8%
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) provides a native photonic quantum heuristic for sampling dense subgraphs from adjacency matrices, offering a scalable physical approach to combinatorial graph search problems.
PAPER REPORTS · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020 (trading effectively April 2020… · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020", "sharpe": "2.050 ± 0.190",…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -1.00 · Return -5.8% · Max DD -6.2%
This paper studies conditional allocation between a growth/technology ETF basket, denoted by $G$, and a defensive income/value-oriented ETF basket, denoted by $D$.
PAPER REPORTS · Selected smooth-score policy, 2017-06-28 to 2026-05-15, 10bp cost: 19.24% CAGR, 19.29% vol, Sharpe 1.01, Sortino 1.22,… · Selected policy vs 50/50 G/D: annual excess 1.78%, tracking error 3.74%, info ratio 0.48, max DD improvement 1.95%
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.92 · Return +111.2% · Max DD -31.6%